Lorne Gale guilty of voyeurism

Lorne Raymond Gale, 44, pleaded guilty to a downgraded charge of attempted voyeurism on Wednesday, Nov. 15, and was sentenced later in the day to a conditional discharge followed by 30 months probation.

Gale won’t have a criminal record if he abides by his probationary terms.

See https://nanaimonewsnow.com/2023/11/17/shes-a-beautiful-girl-nanaimo-engineer-secretly-aimed-camera-at-nude-13-year-old/

Day-long sentencing arguments in provincial court in Nanaimo heard Gale’s damaging and perplexing actions occurred July 14, 2022, and involved his daughter’s friend who was visiting from the Lower Mainland.

While outlining the facts, the Crown’s Leanne Mascolo said members of the Gale family and the unnamed victim were in the hot tub on his Cedar acreage prior to the offence.

Everybody except the offender went inside the home, while Gale remained outside on the exterior deck hanging towels at about 10 p.m.

Gale, knowing full well the girl’s age and a nearby shower inside the home had just turned off, reached above his head to a partially open window with the shower head placed beneath it.

Gale then took a series of pictures in succession until his crime of opportunity was abruptly called out.

“Hey!” the victim responded, upon seeing a phone with its recognizable black case pointed toward her.

Gale went inside and immediately admitted responsibility as his wife consoled the distraught victim.

Shortly after being violated she connected with her mother, however due to the late hour there was nowhere else for her to go.

At the insistence of the offender, Gale and his wife took the girl home the next morning where he took responsibility for his actions in person to the girl’s parents and asked for forgiveness.

Both families were connected through their involvement with their Christian faith, court was told.

Upon his arrest days later, Gale told police he immediately deleted the pictures after being caught by the girl.

Mascolo stated the erased pictures could not be retrieved by police and further extraction efforts would take a lengthy period of time and were not deemed an investigative priority since Gale admitted responsibility.

Based on the offender’s account, no actual photos of the victim were captured due to the insect screen.

Photo from Nanaimo News

Gale’s police interview

About a week after the incident the Nanaimo RCMP, armed with a search warrant, arrested Gale at his home in front of his wife and three kids.

A cooperative Gale provided passwords to several devices, which were seized by police. No incriminating material was found during the police probe of the Gale property.

He was transported to the police detachment where he was promptly upfront about his transgressions.

Stating he had nothing to hide, Gale insisted he didn’t have a sexual preference for children, reiterating he knew the victim was 13-years-old.

“He did tell the officer she’s well developed, has a large chest and a fine physique and she’s a beautiful girl,” Mascolo told the court.

Judge Ron Lamperson took particular interest in the statement.

After hearing the shower turn off, Gale told the investigator he noticed the normally closed window was open, he succumbed to his temptations.

“Mr. Gale also told police that he can’t explain what possessed him in this moment, and he described it as a knee-jerk reaction.”

Mascolo said Gale repeated his observation the victim was a well-developed young woman and her age didn’t match her physical appearance.

Sentencing arguments

The Crown pushed for a 60 to 90-day jail sentence, with Mascolo telling court she strongly opposed a discharge, opening the door for Gale’s record to be wiped clean.

Mascolo said she wasn’t aware of other examples where a child victimized in a similar manner resulted in a discharge.

“The general deterrence in this case, given a 13-year-old girl in a very vulnerable position and an expectation where she would be protected — the court needs, in the Crown’s submission, to send a strong message,” Mascolo said.

The defence’s conditional discharge request, ultimately granted, honed in on the unique circumstances of an accomplished engineer with a Ph.D. and no prior involvements with police.

Attorney Dale Marshall said his client admitted responsibility early on and took the proactive steps for ongoing clinical counseling sessions and a forensic psychiatrist’s assessment.

Gale, who’s had no breaches while released on bail, was determined to be a low risk to re-offend in the foreseeable future.

“This is a man with a lifetime of education, gainful employment and volunteering for the community through his church. He and his family like to travel…a criminal conviction can cause problems to impede travel, particularly to the United States,’ Marshall said.

Stating Gale runs two companies, which includes contracts with all levels of government, Marshall said his client is the sole income source for his family and any jail time would cause cascading negative impacts.

In response to Gale’s comments to police indicating the victim looks more mature than her age dictated, Marshall said the statement was in response to a question of whether Gale is attracted to children.

“In his stress and clumsiness and forthright cooperation with police, he expressed to them that ‘well she’s a very mature young girl’ and was putting into context to the question whether he had any fantasies about children,” Marshall said.

Visibly confused by the explanation, judge Lamperson wondered if Gale would not have targeted the victim if her appearance were more childlike.

“It would be impossible to answer that question because as he said to police very candidly ‘I can’t explain my actions.’”

Marshall said his client has dealt with severe collateral damage, including no church gatherings at his home for the past 16 months and temporary restrictions to be around his children until he was cleared by social workers.

Numerous character reference letters were submitted to the court for Gale, whose community involvement included serving as a member of the Colliery Dam Preservation Society.

Victim impact

While the victim and her family opted not to attend the sentencing hearing, the young girl’s mother submitted a powerful letter to the court.

She said immediately following the incident her daughter had a sudden lack of trust, feared sleeping, had a distrust of public washrooms, and was cautious around adults, particularly men.

Counseling sessions helped her daughter move on, her mother wrote.

“I myself have suffered anxiety and fear of being judged by our church members for being a whistleblower for going to the police when a crime was committed against our child by a member of our church.”

The mother is angry, sad, and riddled with anxiety for trusting the offender’s family with her daughter’s safety.

She hopes Gale gets professional help so he never exploits another child again.

Judgment

Judge Lamperson said deciding on Gale’s punishment was a “close call” and a difficult decision to make.

He emphasized the considerable mitigating factors in Gale’s favour, including promptly accepting responsibility, pleading guilty which ensured the victim wouldn’t have to testify, and the ramifications a criminal conviction would have on the offender and his family’s life.

“Those who work with the federal government even on a contract basis are likely usually obliged to have criminal record checks,” Lamperson said.

The judge believed a carefully crafted probation order with several conditions adequately satisfies the public’s interest.

An order of 100 hours of community service also applies against Gale, while he also agreed to an elevated $3,000 victim fine surcharge.

A visibly distraught Gale attended the hearing alongside his wife.

He didn’t provide a statement to the court, nor to NanaimoNewsNOW.

Productive meeting of friends and workers in Ireland

On Thursday 2 November 2023, a meeting was convened in Fermoy, Co Cork, Ireland at the request of certain of the friends to discuss issues relating to child sexual abuse (CSA) and sexual abuse (SA) within our fellowship in Ireland (both the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and Northern Ireland (NI), referred to in this document as Ireland). Two of the Irish brother workers (John Conley and Craig Fulton) together with 24 of the friends were in attendance. Some of those present were victims or family members of victims.

These notes are a summary of the main concerns raised and some of the rationale / discussion in relation to each concern, that were presented to the workers during such meeting. These notes also include suggested solutions / requested outcomes to address the concerns raised in the meeting. These notes are not an exhaustive summary of all matters discussed at the meeting which ran for some 3 hours.

Introduction

The meeting began with an introduction from the meeting organiser. 

Following this, Craig Fulton gave opening remarks during which he (among other things): 

  • thanked everyone for coming;
  • acknowledged that they (the workers) have received a lot of help and feel a great need of further help (and that is what is desired at the CSA / SA meeting);
  • shared a personal anecdote regarding a family member who is a CSA victim (which he said helps him to understand the deep hurt experienced by both victims and families of victims);
  • stated that he wishes to make it clear that we want to do all that we can to protect our children so they don’t go through the same experience;
  • acknowledged things haven’t always been gotten right in the past and apologised for that and any hurt that has been caused as a result;
  • noted that good progress and development has been made in recent times and this CSA / SA meeting will also contribute to the development of our policies;
  • acknowledged that they (the workers) feel they must communicate more with friends and want to make all aware of what they can do and how they can help;
  • stated that at the beginning of the upcoming special meetings, a document regarding child safety will be read out; and
  • stated that there is a workers’ staff meeting in January 2024 to help staff understand what they can do to help and give them appropriate advice.

Following further opening remarks from the meeting organiser and another attendee, the Designated Liaison Person appointed in ROI gave a summary of procedure and practice in relation to CSA / SA in Ireland. This summary included, without limitation, an overview of the following (which are not covered in detail in this summary):

  • the basis of the policy / practice (legislation and related guidance documents);
  • reporting requirements and some information about reports / disclosures received – for example, that most disclosures aren’t first hand (i.e. they are made by someone other than the alleged victim); and most are in relation to retrospective abuse; 
  • consideration of precautionary measures and safeguards; and
  • sanctions – the Designated Liaison Person’s role is safeguarding children but any sanctions imposed may also be a response to justice or fellowship issues. It was noted that the issue of sanctions is highly complex. If changes are made in response to CSA / SA allegations, they could be because of child safeguarding issues (within the Designated Liaison Person’s remit), justice issues and / or fellowship issues (and that the overseer and other leaders may factor in other considerations that relate to fellowship before steps are taken / changes are made).

WINGS Note: The pdf document below has details of concerns raised and ensuing discussion.
The following outcomes were documented:


Note: The purpose of the CSA / SA meeting was to make the workers aware of / educate them regarding friends’ concerns about CSA / SA issues and the rationale for those concerns. The requested outcomes / next steps as set out below were either raised by friends expressly in the meeting, or (where they were not expressly raised in the meeting), have been included in these notes as suggested paths forward based on the concern and discussion on the relevant point in the CSA / SA meeting. 

A.           Child Safeguarding Statement / Policy and Procedures document (the Child Protection Policy)

The fellowship is required to have the above document pursuant to relevant regulations and guidelines in ROI and NI. It was most recently reviewed in January 2021 and is due for review in December 2023.

1.           That the Child Protection Policy be updated to reflect the role of bishops and other men and women within the church who can assist with managing the CSA / SA crisis.

2.           That additional Designated Liaison Persons or similar people to whom victims can approach (including women) be appointed or identified (and communicated to the friends and directly with children of friends in line with requested outcomes (16) and (17) below). 

3.           That (outside of the Child Protection Policy) consideration be given to an ongoing role that bishops and their wives, and other men and women within the fellowship who are willing to help, might have going forward in relation to handling the CSA / SA issues within our fellowship in Ireland. 

4.           That sister workers be more involved in handling the CSA / SA issues within our fellowship in Ireland (not just attending the mandatory training).

5.           That the Child Protection Policy be made directly available to all people within the fellowship within Ireland in hard copy in January 2024. Suggested route to achieve this is to give bishops sufficient copies for members of their Sunday morning meeting and to request that all bishops hand same out after the Sunday morning meeting.

6.           That consideration be given to the comments contained in the annotation provided when undertaking the upcoming review of the Child Protection Policy.

B.           Culture Change / Need for a Response

7.           That the fact there are serious CSA / SA issues within our fellowship be openly acknowledged.  

8.           That ‘top-down’, responsive and immediate action be led by the workers (with help and involvement from the friends) in relation the CSA / SA issues, so that the existing culture of acceptance in relation to CSA / SA issues becomes a thing of the past and history (of CSA / SA issues occurring but not being properly dealt with) does not repeat itself. It is suggested that continuing to engage with the friends and implementing the other suggested outcomes in these notes would be a good starting point.

C.           Zero Tolerance

9.           That consistent decisions be made in accordance with a clear set of rules going forward in relation to the attendance of alleged perpetrators at all meetings. In particular, please see requested outcomes (11) and (12) below. 

10.         That the Child Protection Policy (specifically the part that is to be publicly available) be updated to reflect the set of rules implemented in relation to requested outcome (9) above to provide accountability going forward. 

11.         That alleged abusers be prohibited from attending any meetings.

12.         That all members of the fellowship be made aware of the internal policy in relation to alleged perpetrators’ attendance at meetings (in line with requested outcome (16) below) and in particular if the decision made is to allow perpetrators to attend certain meetings (although it is strongly hoped that will not be the case), that members are made aware of an alleged perpetrator’s attendance at meetings.

13.         That no alleged abuser be permitted to have a place in the gospel work.

D.          Education and Training

14.         That the bishops and their wives attend a workers’ staff meeting in January 2024 at which (the meeting was told) training in relation to CSA / SA issues will be provided to workers (as a follow-on from training that has already been provided to workers).  

15.         That the request for open communication (in line with requested outcome (16) below) also factor in the need for the friends (and, directly, their children) to be made aware of who they can approach for help / support as needed. 

E.           Communication

16.         That there be ongoing and open communication with all members of the fellowship in relation to CSA / SA issues and the approach taken to remedy them as well as who can be approached for help. Again, the role of bishops in handing out written information to churches should be considered. 

17.         That going forward bishops (and their wives) be kept directly informed regarding alleged perpetrators and decisions made in relation to CSA / SA issues. 

F.           Victim Statements

18.         That going forward, any victim who approaches a worker, Designated Liaison Person, Designated Officer, Deputy Designated Liaison Person or Deputy Designated Officer (or anyone else appointed within the fellowship) with a statement regarding CSA / SA is believed by the person to whom the statement is made, and that that person takes all required action in relation to that statement. 

Closing remarks

  • Many attendees thanked the workers for their attendance and shared words of encouragement to address these issues.
  • Many attendees stated that they wished to help with these issues and the spirit of wanting to help was acknowledged by the workers.
  • The workers noted that there is a long journey ahead and they want to be sure that what the workers start now is something that workers in the future, if time goes on, can reflect on and say that what was started is something of value. 
  • An attendee made the remark that this is something we can unite on and grow stronger from.
  • The meeting organiser thanked everyone for their attendance.

Clarification from Scott Rauscher etc

Bozeman, MT
November 11, 2023

Dear concerned friends,

On behalf of the 5 of us, who signed a letter specifically written for you personally about specific cases on Nov. 9th, 2023 (the few couples of concerned friends in Bozeman), as well as on the behalf of Jim Deming, we want to clarify any misunderstandings regarding victims. We apologize for any misunderstanding our last communication might have caused.

For many to say we do not care about victims’ feelings/needs is patently untrue. We are not insinuating in any way that victims won’t be listened to, believed, or helped from the past, present, or future. We acknowledge and hurt for the victims whose past is very much their present. This includes when there is a realization of what was previously done to them that becomes a very present struggle. We completely support victims in their journey and want to do what we can to help and encourage healing from wounds rather than having to carry them as open sores for their lifetime.

We are not the investigative team nor the trauma team for either the victim nor the perpetrator. We are continuing and will continue to work with all individuals and situations that have been brought to our attention with positive actions that are being taken in this field.

We have personally reached out to potential and known victims and provided resources and care. There has been access to a licensed counselor at no charge to the victims of sexual abuse. We continue to value them and want to protect their safety. Please understand that the spiritual safety for all is our greatest concern.

In true care,

Scott, Tom, Tammy, Heidi & Alexis


WINGS Note: See previous correspondence

https://wingsfortruth.info/2023/11/10/montana-and-wyoming-workers-blocking-historic-cases/

https://wingsfortruth.info/2023/11/13/letter-of-support-for-bozeman-friends/

https://wingsfortruth.info/2023/11/14/darryl-doland-comment-on-scott-rauscher-letter/

Darryl Doland comment on Scott Rauscher letter

Darryl Doland 9:56 pm

to [Redacted]

Tonight Scott R & I connected. As Tom H & Tammy C have already written to some of us, their letter needs to be understood in context. It was sent to 6 couples in Bozeman regarding a conversation that has been going on for months. The way I understand it, the workers & the 6 couples do not agree on some things, but the workers think there isn’t any way to resolve things further, so it’s best for everyone to just move on. There have also been some other friends (besides the workers and 6 couples) involved in their reconciliation efforts. One thing Scott emphasized to me is the statements in his letter have nothing to do with victims coming forward and reporting. He said he wants to reassure me they are doing what they can to support all victims. I am writing this in my own words, so I hope it captures the gist of what was said. I understand there could be some controversy about this report, but I’ll just pass on what was said.


WINGS Note: This relates to a letter written by Scott Rauscher and others, advising that the workers would no longer accept any new complaints about historic events, and indicating a focus on restoration / recovery [of perpetrators?] “taking into consideration the needs of victims”.

Scott Rauscher letter to Montana and Wyoming Friends

Letter of support for Bozeman friends

Letter of support for Bozeman friends

To our Bozeman, Montana concerned friends, and friends worldwide,

We recognize the efforts of our brothers and sisters in Christ in Bozeman asking for safer community practices in restricting abusers from attending typical fellowship gatherings. We support a victim-survivor centric approach to responding to abuses, which means alternative fellowship arrangements for those with abusive behaviors.

We stand with survivors and support them coming forward to address abuse. Understanding and addressing the past is part of a positive and healthy path forward for our fellowship, and is in accordance with Jesus’ teachings to welcome light and truth, and repent.


WINGS Note: Some friends in Washington, N. Idaho and Alaska have written this letter of solidarity and encouragement to the Bozeman, Montana friends, due to their concern about the letter sent by Scott Rauscher etc posted at https://wingsfortruth.info/2023/11/10/montana-and-wyoming-workers-blocking-historic-cases/

This letter advised that the workers would no longer accept any new complaints about historic events, and indicated a focus on restoration / recovery [of perpetrators?] “taking into consideration the needs of victims”.

These friends are gathering signatures via Google Forms at https://forms.gle/TSpvGRC32vgfUxNN9

There are currently more than 280 signatures. The oppportunity to sign will close in 24 hours.

Montana and Wyoming workers blocking historic cases

Nov, 9, 2023

Dear Concerned Friends,

The time has come for us to emphasize where we are with past issues that have been brought to us by you folks. We have sought professional and responsible council all along and have found profitable help from people like [redacted], who supports our positive direction in going forward.

From today, we will not accept any complaints about the past. If there is anything illegal or criminal in any way, we are asking you to take it to the police. We will only deal with the present and the future.

We are embracing the idea of a support/witness plan for those that need help and restoration for positive recovery in the fellowship, taking into consideration the needs of victims. We are not a part of a persecution/prosecution team, but rather seek restoration for every individual. We are not working against our brother or sister, but rather being our brother’s keeper. This fellowship and ministry doesn’t need big changes, but it does require each of us to be honest and accountable.

We can all be a great help and support through prayer for each other. We all have expressed we want unity, and that means we must work towards that together. Godliness is contagious… let’s go forward in that way.

With care for each, Scott, Tom, Tammy, Heidi & Alexis


Scott Rauscher (current overseer of Montana and Wyoming), Tom Hinkle, Tammy Carr, Heidi Henderson, and Alexis Carrier.

Workers expose perpetrator’s lies and provide support to the survivor

It is with deep concern that we are moved to send this letter to all of you. We understand that an email in which Ira and Joan Hobbs misrepresent key information about Katie’s special meeting visit at their home has been circulating privately, though it has not yet been posted publicly.

Katie is our dear sister, and we are worried about the additional harm she may experience due to Ira’s email. We do not want Ira’s letter with misinformation to cause division between us.

We believe and support victim-survivors, and we believe and support Katie. Because the majority of SA and CSA cases go unreported due to shame, fear, and lack of support, we feel it is our responsibility as shepherds to support those who cry out for help.

We would like to directly address the misinformation in Ira’s email.

  • Ira has a long history of sexual assault allegations, some of which he has admitted to. In 2008, Ira was removed from the work because of credible allegations that he committed CSA. One of the victims was only eight years old at the time that she was abused: she is now 71 years old.
  • Mona Reece was not present at the Hobbs’ home during Katie’s visit. Although our special meeting rounds had scheduled Mona and Katie to visit the Hobbs on that date. Mona attended a funeral and stayed in a different home on that date instead. This change of plans left our sister Katie alone in their home.
  • After staying at the Hobbs’ home, Katie experienced complications and sought medical help. The medical professionals who looked after her confirmed that she had been assaulted. They also discovered that she had been drugged with a ‘date-rape drug’ that rendered her helpless against Ira’s assault. This drug is known to have amnesiac effects, meaning (hat the drug prevented our sister from remembering exactly what was done to her during the time that she was drugged.
  • Law enforcement continues to investigate the case against Ira. We, along with Ray Hoffmann, support Katie’s legal team in their efforts to find justice for her and the other numerous victim-survivors of Ira’s assaults.

As friends and workers, we want to be united in our compassion for victim-survivors and to take appropriate steps that will bring an end to this shameful history of abuse. We pray that all victim-survivors would find comfort and peace.

Your brothers and sisters,

Craig Winquist, Daniel Farris, Steve Marshall, Diane Harper, and Jennifer Horton


Comments from Abbi Prussack:

I’d like to take this opportunity to point out a very common defense strategy used by perpetrators of abuse. As we know, abusers “groom” potential victims by establishing trust, and building an image of themselves that makes the victim less likely to resist their behavior and less likely to report it. Abusers also use this tactic with parents, in order to get closer to child victims and create a buffer of doubt, should the child ever try to speak up about the abuse. This letter is an example of someone who is “grooming the public.” By loudly presenting their fabricated version of events alongside vivid details, empathetic statements, and pitiful feelings, they are able to plant a seed of doubt in observers’ minds. If they can convince enough of the public that they are humble and trustworthy, the public will be more willing to doubt, dismiss, and blame the victim-survivors who they have harmed.

———————————-

There is ample evidence of this assault, and there is an ongoing legal investigation. Most survivors aren’t afforded these privileges, and many abusers’ attempts at grooming the public end up to be successful. Please keep this survivor in your thoughts as attempts to retraumatize and silence her continue. We will always stand with survivors, and we are grateful to you all for doing the same.


TRIGGER WARNING

The following letter from Ira and Joan Hobbs is posted to demonstrate how sex offenders operate, often successfully. WINGS strongly supports the response from Craig etc (above) which is a proper response to this type of letter from a perpetrator.


From: “Ira Hobbs” [email redacted]
To: redacted
Sent: Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 8:48 PM
Subject: false report corrected

Our dear Ones,

Due to the internet publishing of false allegations that we heard of this spring, we want to share with you the account of the visit to our home by Mona Reese and Katie Keim 4 years ago.  It was the only time either of them were in our home.

Four years ago, the first week of April (our special meeting time each year), Mona Reese and Katie Keim came to our home in late evening,  Joan and I greeted them, shaking their hands in welcome.  After a very pleasant visit in the living room, we all retired to our bedrooms for the night at 8 p.m.  Each of the visitors got a glass for water as they went.  Our guest rooms are located at the west end of our house, with a private bathroom.  and our bedroom and bath is at the east end.  So, it offers totally privacy for all.  We did not know whether both slept in the one bedroom or used both rooms.

At 7:30 a.m., we served breakfast at the agreed time,  Both Katie and Mona were cheerful and ready for breakfast.  We asked Katie if she would like to offer thanks at the table.  She gave thanks for the food, for the restful night, and for the fellowship we  share together.  She asked for God’s blessing on our day together.  After breakfast, we asked Katie to share how she heard the gospel, and she responded eagerly.  Mona also shared of her experiences.  It was a wonderful time of fellowship.

They returned to their room for continued meditation and prayer in preparation for the special meeting that evening at Edgar Wilson’s home.  At some time in the morning, Katie went outside and gathered early spring flowers and boughs that were budding and arranged them in a vase to present them for the dining table.  Joan was elated, and asked Katie if she had worked as a florist since it was such a nice arrangement.  At lunch, Mona offered thanks, and again we had such pleasant and refreshing sharing.  It was a very memorable visit, so similar to our visits with other workers and friends before then and after that.  They went to another home for supper, and then to the meeting that night.  All the visitors spoke helpfully, giving fresh inspiration and comfort.

So, you might understand why we were shocked beyond measure when we had a visitor to our home this spring – an investigating officer (a lady) from the state police.  She asked if we sometimes had visitors and meetings in our home, and how the visits went.  We spoke of the wonderful fellowship that meant so much to us and to our friends.  Then she asked if we knew Katie Keim and Mona Reese.  Yes, we said they had been to our home a few years ago, and we had such good memories of  the time together.  Then she mentioned that it was reported that Katie might have been abused when they were here.  I said, “What?  Has Katie totally lost her mind?”  We shared memories of the day they were at our home.  The officer examined the layout of our home before she departed.  Joan and I wondered what has happened anyway!

Unfortunately, Katie has been in a field where some relatives of saints have been very active in following the internet opposition to our fellowship in Christ, and have been very critical of workers and saints with accusations both true and false.  They have had their effect on Katie, causing her to be very restive and with loss of interest in the mission work this year.  When Katie was questioned about her accusation of abuse, she said that she had no knowledge of abuse from any man, but others had advised her that it might have been possible without her knowing it.  So, it was obvious her thinking had been controlled by evil advisors who search for ways to reproach believers. Workers and saints were alarmed that Katie was having such a difficult time.

Fortunately, it was arranged for Katie to have a change of fields, to get away from the influence that had troubled her.  She spoke at Rogers, AR convention from Psalm 137, saying she had experienced something like Israel did when they were in Babylon, when she had lost her song in the confusion, and she was thankful for deliverance.  She said, “I never want to experience that situation again ever!”  We are glad that she is in a new field and with fresh prospects of usefulness.

The report from civil authorities this summer was that there was no evidence of any abuse at our home, and there was no reason to justify litigation in the matter.  That was determined after extensive and thorough investigation.

We pray God will forgive those who have published such a devastating accusation that was totally false, and would hope that they will publicize their apology for such lack of discretion.

In spite of all that has taken place, Joan and I have found peace and comfort, knowing that God the Judge of all understands and has given grace to bear the reproach cast upon us.  All in the church here have been great comfort to us.  We thank God for such rich fellowship with them.

Joan joins in loving greetings to each of you.  She wants to add a note to this.  All good wishes, Ira

Dear Hobbs family,

I cannot understand how such a report was published on the internet!  It was totally false, and without any attempt at confirmation of facts.  It has caused us to pray for those who have been so thoughtless and unkind, hoping God will be merciful to forgive them and make them wiser and merciful to others.

We are comforted in that God understands and cares.

We love you and hope that all goes well for you.  Thank you for praying for us.  Love, Joan


WINGS Note: Due to the potential impact on victims of Ira and other perpetrators, comments are blocked for this post.

Power and Abuse in Canada

My name is Marg Meyer.  I was in the Work in Saskatchewan from 1986 to 2001 when I was put out of the Work for visiting folks who were upset with decisions that older brother workers had taken. I was given the decision to stop visiting these folks and stay in the Work or keep visiting them and be no longer in the Work.  Since when does ANYONE have the right in North America to tell anyone else who they can and cannot visit??

Dale Shultz, Merlin Affleck, Jim Atcheson and Mary Roper were the 4 workers who were involved in this action.

This took place 22 years ago.  My name was Marg Magowan.  I believe the letter that I wrote to all workers in BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba is still on the internet somewhere.

My experience with these brother workers is minor (although it still qualifies as abuse) compared to SA and CSA but it demonstrates the disfunction in thinking that is endemic in this Way.  Do not expect them to change their thinking… they have not changed in 22 years.  I do not trust Dale Shultz, Merlin Affleck, Jim Atcheson or Mary Roper still.

As for Mike Hassett:  I once wrote to him after he spoke at convention, taking exception to something he said at convention.  Instead of confronting me about the letter which would have been the appropriate thing to do, he sent the letter to Dale Shultz, and I never heard anything about said letter from either man!

So I do not trust Mike Hassett either.

I am reporting this to this site because when there is so much power awarded to a few men, it leads to a situation where CSA and SA can incubate.  THE SITUATION IS RIPE FOR ALL KINDS OF ABUSE AND ALL OF THESE PERSONS ARE CULPABLE.

I especially feel for sister workers.  They are expected to do WHATEVER they are told by the brothers.  They quite literally have NO autonomy over their own lives… they have NO power whatsoever…. especially the ones who follow around continuously the ones who have been appointed so called “responsibility “.

I truly wish everyone all of the VERY VERY best in finding your way through all of this mess.

Sincerely,

Marg Meyer  (Marg Magowan)

New Zealand Gospel Workers’ Code of Conduct

New Zealand Gospel Workers’ Code of Conduct

“Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity.” 1 Timothy 4. 12.

“Abstain from all appearance of evil.” 1 Thessalonians 5.22.

Children (Under 18) are a vital part of our fellowship; all Workers are responsible for promoting their safety, protection and well-being. Children under 16 years of age cannot even voluntarily engage in any form of sexual contact.

I will:

  • Adhere to the Guidelines for Child-Safety and this Code of Conduct at all times.
  • Be a positive role model to children and follow accepted guidelines relating to physical contact.
  • Set clear boundaries about appropriate behaviour between children and myself and respect a child’s boundaries and personal space.
  • Listen and respond appropriately to the views and concerns of children.
  • Be transparent in my actions and whereabouts in relation to contact with children.
  • Apply the “rule of two” – avoid spending time alone with children, ensuring parents know and support this boundary, and have educated their children about it.
  • Wear publicly appropriate clothes in common areas during visits with families.
  • Address inappropriate behaviour towards children.
  • Ask for help if I am uncertain about child safety, or this Code of Conduct, or believe I have breached this Code.

I will not:

  • Engage in behaviour or communication that causes children to feel uncomfortable, afraid or disempowered.
  • Use language that is inappropriate, offensive, harassing, abusive, or sexually suggestive or provocative when speaking around children.
  • Use any computer, mobile phone, video, camera or other electronic device to exploit or harass children.
  • Do things for children of a personal nature that they or their parents can do for themselves, such as assisting with toileting.
  • Hit or physically assault children. This includes refraining from physical punishment or engaging in discipline.
  • Display favouritism, develop inappropriate or sexual relationships, or indulge in any form of sexual contact with children.
  • Engage in the grooming of children and/or families.
  • Rely on my position or my reputation and that of the fellowship to protect me.
  • Minimise or cover up a suspicion or allegation of abuse.
  • Investigate a suspicion or allegation of abuse by questioning a child or individuals involved, but rather encourage the parents to refer the matter to authorities. Whenever it is appropriate that I myself should do the reporting, I will certainly do so.
  • Dismiss a child’s concerns or discourage disclosure.
  • Allow any child to enter a bedroom where I am staying in the company of myself and/or co-worker.

Some examples of appropriate and/or acceptable behaviour:

  • Handshakes, pats on the shoulder or back and shoulder-to-shoulder hugs.
  • Holding hands while walking with small children.
  • Sitting beside small children.
  • Having discussions one-on-one with older children in publicly accessible areas.
  • Encouraging children to respect personal spaces, i.e. knock on doors before entering.

Some examples of inappropriate and/or unacceptable behaviour:

  • Developing intimate or special relationships with children.
  • Advising children to keep communications or interactions secret.
  • Holding a small child on the lap except in the presence of an adult member of the family. Lifting or placing a school age or older child on your lap.
  • Wrestling, tickling, piggy-back rides or massaging.
  • Remarks that relate to sexual attractiveness or development.
  • Showing physical displays of affection in isolated areas of the premises such as bedrooms, bathrooms, private areas of the home or cars.
  • Sharing a bedroom with a child.
  • Inappropriate or lengthy hugs or kisses on the mouth.
  • Touching buttocks, genital areas, chest, knees, thighs or legs.

Some examples of environments where additional caution should be used:

  • Camping environment
  • Convention grounds
  • Swimming areas
  • Physical sporting events
  • Workers staying with families without a co-worker

In Conclusion:

  • I recognise that children have the right to feel safe at all times.
  • I recognise that child abuse has ongoing impacts and that the first step in healing for survivors starts with the telling of their experience. 
  • Should a child disclose to me that it has suffered abuse from some person, I will respond with compassion and care. I will not make promises to the child I cannot keep e.g. in relation to a child asking to keep matters confidential. Instead I will advise the child, “I will do everything I can to keep you safe.” 
  • I will do all I can to make the child feel heard and supported.

Developed and endorsed for New Zealand October 2023.

Guidelines for Child Safety in New Zealand

Guidelines for Child Safety in New Zealand

Definitions for these Guidelines:

“We” means the inclusion of both Workers (members of the Ministry) and Friends (members of this fellowship) who are part of this voluntary fellowship. 

“Child” or “Children” refers to any person or persons under the age of eighteen (18) years. 

“Parent” or “Parental” is meant to be inclusive of both the parents as well as legal or appointed guardians of any children. 

“Abuse” means any sexual contact of any kind with a child under the age of eighteen (18) years, without the child’s consent, or even with consent for a child aged under sixteen (16) years, because under the law of NZ no child under 16 years can give consent to sexual contact. 

‘Sexual contact’ includes sexual intercourse and also any indecent touching, including when the victim indecently touches the offender, following force or encouragement by the offender.

Statement:

As a fellowship we are committed to providing a safe and secure environment for children. All children have a right to feel and be safe. We are committed to the safety and well being of all children. We will ensure that a caring and appropriate response is initiated should abuse or suspicion of abuse occur. 

These guidelines are written with a focus on children who come into contact with or are part of our fellowship. 

The testimony of our fellowship is supported and maintained by being open and transparent.

Purpose:

The safety, welfare and well being of children is paramount; we believe children should never experience abuse of any kind. 

  • We are committed to conduct ourselves in a way that protects and safeguards children from any possible harm.
  • We are committed to support and respect the healing of survivors of abuse within, or who were once part of, the fellowship.
  • We have zero tolerance of abuse and will comply with reporting requirements of any suspicion of abuse, on reasonable grounds, to the authorities.
  • We encourage reporting by a parent to the authorities of any suspected abuse, on reasonable grounds. Whenever it is appropriate that the gospel worker who has been informed of such abuse should be the one who reports, he/she should do so.
  • We will never make any attempt to manage the legal implications of abuse within our fellowship.
  • We will fully collaborate with law enforcement authorities in any cases of abuse within our fellowship.

Reporting:

• If a child is at risk or in danger call 111.

• To make a report of concern: Call Ministry of Children on 0508 326 459

We encourage parental responsibility for providing education and boundaries to maintain child safety. We will respect any boundaries parents have in place. We encourage open conversation and education in families around child safety.

We expect members of our fellowship to keep children safe.

These guidelines are to be shared with all persons over the age of 16 years within our fellowship.

Any person under legal investigation, or convicted of an offence against a child, will not be permitted to attend any activity in our fellowship that provides access to children, nor any activity in our fellowship where known survivors of abuse are present.

We support a ministry that is itinerant and relies on the support of the fellowship to enable the Gospel to be shared.

All Workers and Elders have a responsibility to be aware of and support all aspects of a child-safe environment.

All Gospel Workers will undertake the following:

  • Complete child-safe training every 2 years.
  • Adhere to these Guidelines and the Workers’ Code of Conduct.
  • Ensure they are respectful of and acknowledge the rights of children, at all times.

Governance:

We will ensure biennial review of these Guidelines or as required.

All Workers will, before commencing in the Gospel work be provided with these Guidelines and the Gospel Workers’ Code of Conduct.

Gospel Workers from overseas visiting New Zealand will be provided with a copy of these Guidelines and the Workers’ Code of Conduct.

Developed and endorsed for New Zealand October 2023.