Netherlands Workers’ letter to Friends

Lieren, June 2024

Subject: Sexual abuse and other inappropriate behavior

Dear Friends,

Current status

Much has happened in the past eighteen months. We are aware that the topic of sexual abuse and other inappropriate behavior is very sensitive Nevertheless, it is necessary to communicate about this once more before our conventions take place.

The preparations for the two conventions in Putten will start soon. We look forward to a time of encouragement, comfort, and help, and we want this to be a reality for everyone under the current circumstances.

Our Father is in control, but we also have our responsibility. As a congregation, we have the duty to ensure that everyone feels safe during the convention and is aware of the serious and shameful situation our fellowship faces worldwide. We hope, as mentioned earlier, that everyone can find encouragement, comfort, and help at the conventions. This is also why we are writing you this letter at this time.

Extent of sexual abuse and other inappropriate behavior within our fellowship worldwide

We again acknowledge the painful truth that some among us. both workers and friends, have been guilty of sexual abuse and inappropriate behavior. Although some perpetrators are now deceased, the victims continue to suffer the consequences of those actions.

We feel deep compassion for those whose trust has been violated and the pain they experience. Those who have had the courage to share their experiences are recognized and appreciated by us. We take the testimonies of each victim very seriously. At the same time, we recognize that there may be people who have not (yet) expressed their experiences. Should the need arise, they can also count on personal support.

To indicate the extent and severity of the situation: worldwide, there are at least 900 reports of people who have been guilty of various forms of sexual abuse. The numbers continue to rise. This includes both workers and friends. The actual number of victims is estimated by experts to be a multiple of the aforementioned number. The victims are often minors.

It has become clear that cases of sexual abuse have often been mishandled by workers and especially by responsible workers. Perpetrators have sometimes been moved from one region to another without anyone being informed and without appropriate consequences for their actions.

In North America, these facts have led to government agencies like the FBI investigating our fellowship worldwide Similar attention is also expected in other countries, including the Netherlands. In various English-speaking countries, there has been media attention on our fellowship and the issues of child sexual abuse. It is not unlikely that there will also be media attention in the Netherlands for our congregation here. We are prepared to provide the press with a response to questions if necessary.

Additionally, it is important to mention that other forms of unacceptable inappropriate behavior also occur among us. Unfortunately, there are many examples we could cite, including abuse of power and belittling. We acknowledge their existence with deep regret. We aim to foster open dialogue about these matters.

There is no justification for any form of abuse within our fellowship. We deeply regret all cases, and the fact that they have often been mishandled. We want to emphasize that any form of abuse is completely unacceptable.

What steps are we taking?

All this leads us to serious self-examination and a change in our approach and attitude. This applies to all of us. We find it essential that all friends and all workers are invoked in this change. This will take time, as it is not easy for many.

A group of friends (advisory group) has, together with the three responsible brothers, drafted advice. This advice focuses on implementing a system for detecting and reporting abuse and other inappropriate behavior and promoting a biblically responsible way of interacting with each other. More helpers will be needed to further develop the chosen direction. The following processes have been initiated together with this group:

  • For the future, we are looking for confidants within our fellowship. Finding these people will take time. They will need to undergo training to know how to properly handle reports. An internal confidant can be more approachable when it comes to asking for help.
  • During this search period, three temporary confidants will be appointed to bridge the gap.
  • We are also looking for an external confidant. An external (independent) confidant provides an additional avenue for reporting and may be preferable for some because there is no internal connection to our fellowship.
    • Internal and external confidants have the skills to handle reports of abuse and inappropriate behavior. The presence of confidants among us does not mean that you can only approach those people if something is wrong. But they are available for support and guidance and also to identify issues.
  • A protocol with guidelines on sexual abuse will be established, as is done in other countries.
  • Within our means, we will carefully handle any concerns about visiting workers (as far as we can determine, there are no visiting workers involved in sexual abuse or inappropriate behavior at these conventions).
  • Preparations are being made so we know how to respond to potential media attention.

All Dutch workers have completed the “Ministry Safe” course We would like to offer this course to you as well. It is an awareness training on child abuse consisting of several videos in English (a Dutch translation is available). If you are interested, please email Bart (email redacted)

Information evening on July 12 in Putten

On Friday, July 12 (DV), there will be an information evening in Putten. During this evening, the workers and the advisory group will be available to answer questions and provide information about sexual abuse and other inappropriate behavior. If you are interested in attending, please register by email with Wim (email redacted). When registering, you can also submit any questions and/or comments. Just to be clear: this evening is only for adults, so do not bring minors.

All your help and involvement are greatly appreciated.

It is important that we continue to discuss these difficult subjects together. Awareness and honest communication by everyone are good ways to ensure that our fellowship is safe and remains so.

We are grateful for all the conversations that have already taken place and hope that our letter will stimulate even more discussions on these difficult subjects.

Thank you for your help and prayers.

Welcome to Putten.

Your workers

Workers’ Letter to Montana Elder and Wife

Dear [redacted] and [redacted],                                                           July 3, 2024

Thank you for your clarification. There isn’t much to say except our hearts are deeply saddened by your decision to not have anything to do with God’s established ministry. We would like you to know we have appreciated your open home and hospitality to the church through the years. Your help and care toward the elderly folk has been valued too. You said you did not feel moved to make this public. After much prayer and consideration and consulting Doyle and Tom, we feel it is only right & fair for each in your meeting to know about your decision. Therefore, we will send out an email for each in your meeting, notifying them of your stand, and offer the choice to remain in your meeting or move to one that is under the purview of the ministry. This effectively gives each the opportunity to declare whether they believe in a God-established ministry or not. We will include all the other elders in this communication, as it could affect them too. 

We do have a question for you, that someone brought up: Who appointed you as an elder and put a meeting in your home? Was it the ministry? The ministry was established from heaven even before the fellowship was, and it is something that we cannot change. We absolutely know there are individuals that horribly abused place and power in the ministry and in the fellowship, and have caused great harm. For that we are terribly sorry. We cannot remove the ministry nor fellowship that God established, but rather the individuals that commit horrible abuse. You cannot have the fellowship without the ministry. God will never lead two people in two different directions by his Holy Spirit.

We personally have been in contact with trauma therapists, lawyers, local and federal authorities, and are very aware of what is being done. We are glad for their guidance in going forward.

We will keep you in our hearts and prayers,
Doyle, Tom
Tammy, Heidi & Alexis


WINGS Note: This letter was not provided to WINGS by the elder.

For the workers’ letter to meeting attendees, see https://wingsfortruth.info/2024/07/04/letter-to-montana-meeting/

Letter to Montana meeting

WINGS Note:

This Letter from church leadership in Montana/Wyoming/Oregon/South Idaho was sent to the members of a meeting in Montana. The elders of that meeting expressed to the ministry that they cannot currently support the ministry, but did not request for their meeting to be disbanded.


Dear Friends in the Meeting,                                                                              July 3, 2024

We feel we need to be in touch with each of you in [redacted] and [redacted] Sunday and Wednesday meeting. [redacted] & [redacted] have been in touch by email. They said, “We have been moved, without any doubt in our hearts, to step aside from the purview of the ministry at this time.” They did clarify this by saying, “The Spirit of God no longer moves us to associate with, and support a ministry who is not willing for serious self-examination and genuine repentance.” Our hearts are deeply saddened. The ministry was established from heaven even before fellowship and it is something that we cannot change. We absolutely know there are individuals that horribly abused place and power in the ministry and in the fellowship and have caused great harm. We cannot remove the ministry nor fellowship that God established, but rather the individuals that commit horrible abuse. You cannot have the fellowship without the ministry.

We feel each one of you should know about this and have the opportunity to declare your choice, whether to continue attending meetings at [redacted] and [redacted] home or move to a meeting that believes and follows the doctrine that was established, not by individuals, but by the God of heaven through Jesus, to the ministry. There is room in the other Sunday meetings, so please feel free to contact us IF you are wanting moved from the [redacted] meeting. There will also be a new Wednesday morning meeting home, and we are in the process right now of sorting this out. Thank you for your patience with us as we seek God’s guidance and help.

We are not in the field, but after input and advice from Doyle and Tom we felt this shouldn’t wait till we are back in the field. I have phone service in Canada and will visit with anyone that needs/wants to visit via email, text or phone.

These are truly difficult times, but God in his infinite wisdom and time makes things very clear… There has to be a separation if we do not believe in what God established. We need your prayers so desperately.

With care,

Doyle, Tom

Tammy, Heidi & Alexis

United Open Arms (UOA) Therapy Fund Helpline is now Operational

July 2, 2024

On May 25, United Open Arms (UOA), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization registered in Minnesota, announced that it had been created to provide therapy funds for sexual abuse survivors connected to our fellowship.

The UOA Therapy Fund Helpline is now operational. Survivors seeking financial help for current therapy can call 1-888-564-3073 and talk confidentially with an intake specialist.

Survivors can learn about UOA and donations to support survivors can be made at the website, www.UnitedOpenArms.org

Survivors located in the United States will be considered for financial assistance. As there is a continuing need for this support, UOA will complement other therapy funds and private efforts. UOA is managed by unpaid volunteers with a variety of backgrounds.

A confidential process has been established to maintain the privacy of survivors needing therapy funds and the privacy of donors who wish to provide financial assistance. UOA has partnered with RAINN, the nation’s largest anti-sexual violence organization, to provide a dedicated therapy fund helpline for survivors. Trauma-informed intake specialists from RAINN will answer survivors’ calls. These specialists, trained specifically for UOA’s helpline, will assist survivors to determine eligibility for financial assistance.

The UOA helpline will not investigate abuse allegations or provide crisis intervention. If a survivor calls and needs immediate assistance, the RAINN intake specialist will transfer the call to a crisis center. Also note that RAINN is a mandatory reporter, meaning that if a caller discloses identifying information concerning the abuse of a child or vulnerable adult, a report will need to be made to local authorities. 

RAINN will refer survivors who qualify for financial assistance to an independent third-party claims administrator who will work with the survivors to pay for the therapy as funds become available. RAINN and the claims administrator will safeguard survivors’ privacy so others, including the UOA Board, will not know who has received financial assistance.


See initial announcement: Financial Support for Therapy

Letter from the WA guidelines team

Subject: Our Journey on the Guidelines Team

Dear WANIDAK Staff,

We hope this email finds you all keeping well. As we reflect on our journey with the guidelines team, we recognize the shared experiences we’ve had together. This journey as we worked to create a safer environment for our fellowship has been filled with both joy and heartache.

When we were approached to join the guidelines team, we felt a profound sense of joy and responsibility. The mission to protect our children and vulnerable members resonated deeply with us, and we saw the great privilege in using our God-given talents to create professional guidelines to serve this purpose. Our aim was to reflect the same loving compassion that Jesus showed during his time on earth. While Jesus’ name was never explicitly mentioned in the guidelines, we strongly feel the guidelines we developed mirrored His heart for the children and the vulnerable among us.

The advantages of the guidelines we developed were clear: they aimed to foster a secure environment where all could feel safe, respected, and cared for by each and every one of us. We worked hard to create guidelines that truly embodied the spirit of our fellowship, making trust and safety paramount, while also ensuring fair and consistent treatment that provided hope for all victim survivors and offenders alike. Ultimately, we felt we upheld professional and best practice standards and simultaneously offered the pathway to restoration and peace. We were able to acknowledge the past and current hurt, recognize the responsibility we all have towards victim survivors, and show that we understood the need for accountability by those who have offended so gravely.

However, as we made progress in our journey, we encountered significant resistance from some in the ministry for a variety of reasons. We heard concerns that our Guidelines did not allow for discretion in decision-making, discounting what some perceived as repentance on the part of offenders, being too harsh towards perpetrators, and even that the scope of the problem seemed exaggerated and would be sufficiently addressed through the education already received. Overall, the ministry expressed concerns that the guidelines felt restrictive and corporate, that they were brittle, that needy sinners called perpetrators will be cut off from the help that they need, that they were too tight and demanding. and that they hindered the preaching of the gospel. There was resistance to our incorporation of various resources for victim survivors due to the groups involved in these resources. There were complaints that the guidelines were too lengthy, too detailed, or included strong language.

After our meeting in Walla Walla, we on the team felt like we had taken a step forward and were opening the door to allow for collaboration to address the concerns that did not interfere with the professional best practices conclusions we were asked to create. We did incorporate the changes that were applicable, clarifying, and appropriate. But as weeks progressed, there was a sense of discouragement as we continued to receive the same comments and questions that we had already addressed, and there seemed very little flexibility or openness to consider our perspective from the ministry. It’s likely that some of you felt the same from us. We received both public and private feedback that expressed offense on the part of some of the staff due to perceptions that we were attempting to restrict or control your role by providing expectations for conduct, as well as offense that the ministry seemed to be ‘targeted’ and was being unfairly spoken of with regard to the rate of offenders.

We also received resistance related to our minimum requirement of a yearly, one-hour training by the ministry and elders, which was disheartening. To us, this communicated a belief that the education you had received thus far was sufficient, and that the hurt of victim survivors and a need to increase safety was less important than having to give one hour a year to refresh your memory on awareness of grooming and patterns of abuse. Relatedly, it felt as though all we were hearing were cries again and again on behalf of the offenders, about the impact on their lives, and about possible false allegations; and yet, we received very little communication about the care and love for the victim survivors. Given our empathy, understanding and experience with the deep trauma of abuse, as well as some of our own identities as survivors, this felt like another blow and a disheartening step away from the love of Jesus.

Some in the ministry did not endorse the work of the professionals partly because those of us writing them had not been selected by the ministry itself. One of the most hurtful aspects of this process was receiving criticism from the staff on our professional qualifications, our motives, and most importantly, our spirits. Some of this criticism and negativity was voiced directly to us, but even more hurtful, was learning these views about us were being voiced to others. There were those among you spreading misinformation about our character, our spirit, our scriptural knowledge and understanding, our intentions, and the contents of the guidelines. It is undeniable that many of us in the fellowship experienced a loss of trust in the ministry 15 months ago, but the recent perceptions and statements we learned of that were made about us or made about our current crisis at large felt like another devastating blow and a further fracturing of trust.

In the past weeks, new conversations arose. We heard concerns about investigations because GRACE captured some of the other underlying problems in our fellowship apart from CSA and SA. There were also conversations about the guidelines being re-traumatizing to those who had moved on through the grace of God; though again, there was no mention of those victims who are still hurting and still crying out. We began to see the ministry turn back to the way these terrible problems and hurts were mishandled in the past: with so-called Spirit-led discretion by the ministry. While many of you may have found a palpable sense of peace in the recent workers’ meeting, many of the rest of us felt the opposite. We felt despair that all of our efforts, our conversations, and our pleadings of the last year had all amounted to the ministry choosing to preserve their own power and authority above all else.

As time passed, it became evident that the ministry’s path was diverging from ours. We learned of the creation of ‘modified’ versions of our own work, and then of conversations of scriptural guidelines, and then a turn towards a minimalist set of guidelines. While our task and purpose was to create comprehensive protections, the continued passage of time revealed the ministry valued an approach much different than we had envisioned.

In the end, we realized that for the benefit of our community, particularly the families with children to protect, we needed to move forward and publish the guidelines. Maybe some of you have felt that we were being prideful, vindictive, or seeking conflict when you learned we were publishing our guidelines. This was not the case. In fact, our decision to do so was a prayerful and thoughtful leading in which we were all settled in peace. While this journey has been fraught with challenges, we remain hopeful that these guidelines will serve as a foundation for safety and trust within our fellowship.

Thank you for taking the time to read about this journey. We are sure that some of our feelings and experiences may mirror some of your own, as is often the case when two paths diverge. We are hopeful that we can find a way to align our efforts for the greater good of our community, and that, above all else, we feel and show an unending love for God. There is a deep sense of gratitude on our team that we were a part of this process. The fellowship we have experienced with each other and the friendships we have found along the way are encouraging and invaluable.

Warm regards,

The Guidelines Team


WINGS Note: For background, see

WANIDAK ‘Unapproved’ Guidelines

WA NID AK Staff Discussion re Guidelines

Church Investigation in India Finds No Wrong

WINGS Note: David Jayaraj’s North American convention tour in August 2023 was prematurely terminated due to credible allegations of indiscretions with adult women and unverified CSA allegations. See WINGS reports:

Clarification re removal of Indian worker

Indian worker removed from Olympia, WA convention


Letter from Church Leadership in India

MESSAGE TO THE STAFF 

As you know, in March, 2024 a group of overseers from various places met together with the local staff in India to help the staff deal specifically with allegations that have been made against David Jeyaraj and Jeeva Panchavarnam as well as other issues of concern in the Church. On March 31 a decision was made that David Jeyaraj and Jeeva Panchavarnam would be asked to step down from their places in the work while an investigation into the allegations against them was made.

On April 2, 2024, Four of the overseers along with Prabhakar met with a trusted legal advisor that a respected elder of the Church introduced them to. They asked for his advice as to how best to carry out this investigation. After carefully considering the nature of the allegations that we are dealing with, and the lack of detail provided in the allegations he strongly advised against hiring a third party agency to look into these allegations. His hesitance to suggest engaging in a third party agency, was based on the fact that there is corruption that exists in this country and that ‘pay-offs’, in the end would determine the outcome. He has suggested that it is the proper procedure that those who are responsible for guiding the work in our fellowship, look into and deal with these cases. He further helped us sift through the material we have and has given us his opinion on what action, if any, should be taken in each case. We feel that this is the right and scriptural way to handle this based on 1 Corinthians 6:1 to 7, where Paul strongly recommends that matters like these be settled within the fellowship rather than taking them to be settled by unbelievers in the world, but only when no criminal activity has been found to have taken place. Otherwise it will be taken to the relevant authorities.

In following the recommendations given us by the legal advisor, we have undertaken to look carefully into the allegations that have been made against David and Jeeva. It has became clear that there is not sufficient, verifiable proof of the allegations made against them to justify them being asked to leave the work. In our investigation we have had to sift the truth out of many untruths so of course we were left with some questions still. Unfortunately, as we sought to find the truth in these matters, we did find that an anonymous person, or group of people, whose motives are very questionable, appear to be responsible for making the majority of these allegations.

We appreciate David and Jeeva’s cooperation in agreeing to quietly step down from being active in the work while this investigation was in progress. Now that the investigation has been concluded, we find no reason why they should not continue to fill an active place in the work on this staff.

It has saddened us all to think we should need the help of a legal advisers when we believe that we are the children of the Living God and we’re following His Son Jesus as our Saviour in all things that he lived and taught.

Darryl Doland Issues Guidelines for WA NID AK

June 19, 2024

Dear WA, N ID & AK friends,

During the past year I’ve communicated with you regarding our responses to the Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) crisis in our region.  Today I would like to bring you up to date on some of the conclusions we have recently come to.

For the past several months, we have been in the process of developing a set of CSA/SA guidelines.   An incredible amount of energy and heart has been poured into this project by a group of professional friends, which we are very thankful for.  The further we went along, the more we sensed we were engaged in an unending struggle.  If the guidelines are written strictly, they lack flexibility for individual cases; if the guidelines are written loosely, they have ‘holes’ in them.  Our efforts to dissolve this tension have been unsuccessful.  In the end, we chose to adopt a set of simple guidelines which were written for neighboring states and have been adapted to fit our region.  I’m sending that document with this email.  Even though this outcome is different than any of us had envisioned, I feel the journey that brought us here has been profitable and will continue to provide important insight in the difficult decisions that are still ahead of us.

It’s important to emphasize that we will continue to vigilantly address CSA/SA issues.  We will continue to seek professional counsel and collaborate with elders and others regarding decisions that need to be made.  We, as workers, realize we are not qualified to make these decisions on our own.

We have really appreciated the help of the safety team during the past few months.  Our change of direction on guidelines will result in a restructuring of the safety team also.  We are not sure what that will look like, but will keep you informed of changes.

When FBI agents talked to us in January, they identified two things in our fellowship that have contributed to our poor handling of CSA cases in the past: 1) lack of education; and 2) resistance to reporting CSA cases to local authorities.  We are giving these two key elements special attention as we go forward.

On a related note, the GRACE investigation that was taking place in Seattle has concluded.  The investigation substantiated the allegation that was brought forward.  This concludes our involvement with GRACE.

Personally, I have been inspired and humbled by Paul’s words in 2 Corinthians 11:3, “But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity (sincere & pure devotion) that is in Christ.”  Although issues can become very complicated, we aim to maintain our single-hearted devotion to Christ.

I feel deeply grateful for all of you who have supported us with your prayers and expressions of care this past year.  I hope the peace of God prevails in all our lives, and that His love can radiate through us to everyone in need.

Your brother,

Darryl

WANIDAK ‘Unapproved’ Guidelines

A small team of four professionals plus one worker liaison have been working on regional guidelines for the WANIDAK region, at the request of the overseer Darryl Doland. However, Darryl recently made the decision to be aligned with other overseers around the country and to scrap the WANIDAK project in favor of the very vague, 2 page document Oregon has been using. 

The WANIDAK Guidelines Team decided to share their work widely for the benefit of many of the friends who have been asking for a safer path forward. If nothing else, it offers a model for dealing with CSA/SA within the system, and may help families set safer boundaries in their own lives and homes. The following content is from the WANIDAK Guidelines Team.


Dear all, 

We want to acknowledge the hurt and suffering of all victim survivors in our fellowship, known and unknown. We see you, we hear you, we believe you, and we grieve alongside you for the pain you have experienced. Thank you for your bravery and your courage in being on the front line in our current crisis.

Each of us on the guidelines team were drawn to serve in this manner because of a deep love for God, a love for others, especially the vulnerable, and a desire to see the necessary changes to making this fellowship safer for all. Over the past five months, we have poured our hearts, and, importantly, our expertise as professionals into these guidelines. The final product is a culmination of countless hours of research, discussion, thought, prayer, and consultation, and we firmly believe that it adheres to best practices in the reporting and addressing of CSA and SA.

It was our hope and prayer that there would be a unity shown forth to the fellowship from the guidelines team and the ministry that would exemplify a deep care for victims, an unwavering commitment to the vulnerable, and a recognition and adjustment of unsafe practices. In the past month, following open discussion with the staff, the opportunity for the ministry to ask questions, give feedback, or express concerns, and continued conversations had within the ministry themselves, progress stalled. Ultimately, we provided a finalized copy of the guidelines according to professional standards and best practices, and this has been met with resistance from some of the ministry.

The final decision was made to not implement the guidelines our group produced. Rather, the ministry decided to pursue brief, ambiguous guidelines that rely on the workers to make decisions in conjunction with the elders, and the safety team should that team continue to exist. These shifts away from professional expertise while allowing for ministry-based decisions about the handling of CSA/SA are not something this guidelines team can support or condone. We found it imperative to release the official version of our guidelines for the purpose of transparency and in the hope of encouraging the ministry, and the fellowship at large, to adopt practices that promote safety. We want to make it abundantly clear that the attached version of the guidelines is the only product of our work that has our endorsement and support.

Even though these guidelines were not ultimately accepted or implemented, we believe that we can each take on the responsibility to make many of these things common practice and to keep each other accountable. We encourage you to read these guidelines as an educational tool, keep them as a reference guide, and most importantly use these concepts to help guide these difficult natural choices and conversations with people. We encourage the friends and the ministry to use this document to make safe choices. We implore everyone to please be mindful of the children and vulnerable among us and to do all we can to protect them. We can all show love by raising our voices in support of survivors and by all being active to hold offenders accountable for their actions. 

It has been a privilege to be a part of this team and to dedicate our efforts into the hope for a safer fellowship. Our hearts are grieved at the direction this journey has gone, and for those who are mourning, we mourn with you. 

We are sending out four documents: (1) the background leading to the creation of guidelines; (2) a summary of the guidelines; (3) frequently asked questions (FAQs); and (4) the full WaNIdAk proposed guidelines. Please feel free to reach out to us in the future if you need assistance, have questions, or have any concerns. 

With care, 

The WaNIdAk Guidelines Team


Summary of the Guidelines:

  1. All adults in our fellowship are expected to be mandatory reporters.
  2. Sunday, Union, and Wednesday meeting elders (and wives) need to complete MinistrySafe training yearly. Elders should create and foster a safe environment for all, especially for children and those who are vulnerable. Legally, elders would be considered clergy.
  3. There are consequences for unacceptable and criminal behavior.
  4. All CSA allegations must be reported to authorities. SA victims are encouraged to report to authorities. We will never attempt to handle allegations “in-house,” or to shield perpetrators from the justice system. We realize the justice system helps offenders by holding them accountable for their crimes.
  5. A Safety Team, composed of a team of friends and one worker liaison, will ensure compliance with policy, including facilitating:
    a. Help for victims of abuse.
    b. Third-party investigations regarding allegations.
    c. Therapy, meeting restrictions, and a Safety Plan for perpetrators.
    d. Appropriate communications.
    e. Tracking of Red Flag behaviors and concerns.
    f. Consequences for policy violations.
  6. All past and present CSA and SA allegations will be taken seriously and handled professionally. Allegations will result in an immediate suspension of fellowship while:
    a. Appropriate reports are made.
    b. A professional investigation takes place (if needed).
    c. Appropriate therapy is completed (typically 12 months or more).
    d. Appropriate safeguards are established.
  7. After therapy, a safety plan will be created and closed (designated, all-volunteer) meetings may be established for perpetrators, depending on the recommendation of their therapist. Offenders will continue to be restricted from attending gospel meetings, special meetings and conventions in person to keep these gatherings safe for everyone and to help offenders avoid triggers and temptation.
  8. Expectations for all adults, with additional provisions for elders and workers, are included and are expected to be followed by all adults in the fellowship. These include basic safety precautions, such as that no adult should be alone with a child in an isolated area unless they are the parent, guardian, or a designated caregiver.
  9. These guidelines are based on best practices and backed by professional standards and research.

WA NID AK Staff Discussion re Guidelines

Two weeks ago WINGS reported on the December 2023 Zoom call with the Arkansas Missouri Oklahoma Task Force and Craig Winquist, where Craig announced that he felt that there should not be any formal Child Safety policy.

Now we have learned that the Washington, North Idaho, Alaska staff had a meeting on June 4, 2024, where they discussed significant reservations about their proposed guidelines.

See audio recording https://youtu.be/PthIdsztZ9E

and a lightly edited transcript

Some of the issues being discussed were:

  1. An amazing number of people in the fellowship have been victims and perpetrators in the past but some have moved on with God’s grace and should not be re-traumatised by having their cases re-opened.
  2. Other people are still traumatised and need help and support.
  3. Some of those people are still anonymous.
  4. The Grace Investigation is not seen as a positive outcome by some, and not seen as a good basis for all future cases. There is concern that funds donated by friends should not be used to pay for external investigations.
  5. George Peterson issued some guidelines based on selected scripture, characterising the fellowship as a family, rather than an organisation.
  6. There is a belief that guidelines/policies are only appropriate for corporates and formal organisations, not for the fellowship ‘family’.
  7. Issuing universal guidelines creates risk that the whole organisation might be sued and suffer financial cost, whereas regional guidelines with some differences may provide legal protection.
  8. Issuing policies Is likely to be divisive. Failing to issue policies is also likely to be divisive.
  9. Issuing guidelines based solely on scripture is less likely to be divisive, for those who believe in the truth and adequacy of scripture. It isn’t clear whether Old Testament scripture is as relevant as New Testament scripture, nor is it clear how various scripture references are to be interpreted and applied to specific CSA circumstances.
  10. There is clear agreement that all accusations should be reported to authorities, and that education is necessary for all – workers, families, etc.
  11. A lot is left to the discretion of workers and elders if there aren’t clear guidelines.
  12. Perpetrators should not be cut off from the help they need, IF they are willing to seek help.
  13. Issuing guidelines will help people understand that the fellowship is taking the matter seriously.
  14. Guidelines will promote fairness, to avoid advantaging the well-known and well-connected people and disadvantaging the less well-known. Even safety teams can be biased by family or friendship connections, and those conflicts should be resolved by open discussion (Matthew 18).
  15. Issuing guidelines will show to the authorities that the fellowship is taking it seriously and has accountability.
  16. The bible is relevant for spiritual matters but not for matters such as physical health.
  17. Issuing and talking about guidelines will help everyone recognise that the subject can be discussed/reported and should not be hidden.
  18. A safety team of elders and professionals can be of great help to ensure appropriate decisions and actions are taken, as it may not be clear to workers what action should be taken.
  19. The workers are not smarter than lay members, who may have better understanding of what’s going on in the world.
  20. Decisions about CSA policies may cause a major divide in the fellowship.
  21. Trying to please the majority is a political decision, not scriptural. Scripture teaches to seek and support the one lost sheep, rather than prioritising the majority.
  22. Guidelines are needed because there is a history of overseers making horrible, atrocious, mistake after mistake over the last century.

WINGS observes that:

  • There is still widespread lack of knowledge of the enormous number of perpetrators and victims, with the likelihood that there will be many more reports, especially in other countries where there has been minimal publicity.
  • Many people have left the fellowship because of CSA disclosures and concern about how they have been, or are being, handled.
  • Some countries and regions have no guidelines/policies, and others have documents of varying quality/relevance.
  • There is widespread belief by workers that actions should be guided by common sense and the Spirit, yet that has failed over the last century. Being spirit-led, i.e. doing what I feel is right, has resulted in rampant dishonesty, manipulation and harm to thousands of victims and has violated Christ’s principles, virtues, compassion, truth and even basic justice.
  • There has been minimal progress in providing support for victims, such as funding for therapy, even though the fellowship is reported to have many millions of accumulated funds.
  • The dynamics of this subject show tension between overseers as rulers of the fellowship, and experienced educated elders who observe the many bad decisions that have been made by overseers, and have therefore created guidelines to support victims and minimise the risk of harm to further vulnerable children.
  • Minimising the risk of harm to children and supporting past victims should be the guiding objectives.

WINGS intends to post a series of questions, to allow anyone to contribute suggestions of what should be done better to reduce the risk and minimise the number of cases of harm to children, and to support victims of past abuse.

Child Safety – Backed by Policy, or just left to being Spirit Led?

In response to the avalanche of Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) and adult Sexual Abuse (SA) disclosures since early 2023, various groups have been drafting and issuing policies and guidelines. The Australian and New Zealand overseers have even created a website with their documents including Worker Code of Conduct and Child Safe Policy. However other areas have not developed or issued any guidelines/policies, or are failing to adopt draft documents.

In December 2023, there was a Zoom call with the Arkansas Missouri Oklahoma Task Force and Craig Winquist, overseer of the region, to discuss draft guidelines for safe church practices. Jennifer Horton, worker in Oklahoma, was also present. The call was recorded with the consent of all who were present. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHkiXL0EjSw

Starting at 32:20, Craig advised that he did not feel that there should be any formal policy.

The summarised questions/comments and Craig’s responses, are noted below:

Re Developing North Carolina Guidelines for Tri-state area

Craig Winquist Well I’m you know familiar at least in some ways with what we’re looking at here. I guess you know I raised up in some of our first conversations and that is you know it’s a matter whether we do anything or not really, and then if we do what do we do.

I know last year when this all started in the spring, I was under the impression that we probably could come up with something that would be helpful policy if you want to. I was really positive on that and I’ve talked to a lot of other people. I talked to Matt and he worked with Kurt; he was months into that with him but the more he got into it, you could say the less he felt good about it and I’m coming actually to kind of the very same conclusions. I just am not at peace with trying to institute a policy like this, and so it’s going to be a problem I know, but I obviously have to live with my own conscience and be at peace with what I feel I can do for all of us and so I don’t know where to go from here for everyone.

I know that a lot of people feel if we don’t have policy that somehow we’re abandoning the whole thing on CSA and SA and I don’t feel it has to be that way at all, but I don’t see any way to be able to push this forward and impose it on people that I know are unwilling for that and don’t think it’s necessary. I don’t see it as creating unity. I think there has to be some other way, and I don’t know. It’s just I’m just speaking from my heart. I noticed that in the task force that those most of the people involved were all pro policy and there was no one, as far as I can tell, that really attempted to find some other route or suggest any other thing. So I don’t feel that we’ve had really a lot of balance along that line either.

We’re pretty far into the process and the reason we are is because I wanted to be fair and I want to listen to the different points of view, but at the same time I have to do what I feel is right and I’ve prayed about it, thought about it, and it’s no simple process at all.

Re: If there isn’t a policy, how would actions be communicated?

Craig Winquist Well I don’t know just what the wording would look like exactly. The only thing I know is that when these cases arise that we obviously want to, I mean we’re just going to do what has been said. We’re going to listen to the victims, the accusations, the process be a lot the same in terms of people have to step aside from their meeting. We’ll have to look at that in that way. So what we practice I don’t think could be in a lot of ways different from policy, but I don’t see any way of being able to create some kind of enforcement mechanism. I feel it really is something that we need to have the direction and guidance of God and of the spirit in a lot of these situations. I don’t see any kind of human algorithm or process that really does that. But, that doesn’t mean that we’re going to drop that, ignore that, or go around it in some way.

Re: How would ‘Spirit led decisions’ be different to what has happened in the past?

Craig Winquist Well I think there’s a number of things that can do that because obviously when people are going to come forward it’s going to occur in a certain area. It’s going to be a certain family, it’s going to be a certain Church, so our level of awareness of what’s taking place is a whole different world of understanding at this point in time. So the church isn’t going to drop it and we’re not going to drop it in that sense either.

What we’ve already done in the state is, when these cases have come up and they’re all old cases, that we’ve asked those people not to be in the meetings presently and that is kind of revolutionary at least in some areas anyway.

I’m just saying things here but I mean it’s going to involve the church. I think the church obviously has an interest in what takes place and so you know we’re not going to do something that the church isn’t happy with either. so I think there’s a number of people involved that would make sure the outcomes are not going to look in the future like they maybe have in the past, but until you actually have that happen, I don’t know how to how to test that really.

Re: (1) There are many people (perhaps 50% in the Tri-state area) who are unaware of the Dean Bruer case, and not aware that there are already 670 known abusers and thousands of cases, so it isn’t being honest if everyone doesn’t know how bad it is.
(2) Failing to have a policy is not bring unity.
(3) There are many guidelines in the Epistles that have been followed, and many sanctions for breach of other unwritten moral policies, so why is there a struggle to deal with the criminal matters of CSA and SA.

Craig Winquist What I’m saying is that dealing with it doesn’t necessarily mean writing North Carolina policy. Obviously there’s a lot of things that have happened that have caused people to lose confidence in the workers or their judgment or however you want to put it, so you want to turn to some other means to find something you think is fair or right. I understand that. I just am not convinced that’s what God wants us to do. I don’t see any reason why we can’t just handle that because we just want to do the right thing.

Re: Predators taken out of the meeting presently. What happens after presently?

Craig Winquist Well I think that would have to work with the local churches involved in that decision about what they would do, what they feel about the person and yeah I don’t know, that would have to be on the ground at the time.

Re: As a leader, you need to lead, yet you don’t want to upset people.

Craig Winquist I can’t just stand here and ad lib that kind of answer. I mean it’s obviously a serious consideration about what that means and I can only do what I feel comfortable with. My decisions that I’m making, I find difficult from two points of view. I know I’m going to be making some people unhappy and it doesn’t matter what I choose, that’s simply not a possibility, especially the situation we’re in now. There isn’t any easy way forward; if it was we’d all be headed there.

All I can do is what I feel in my own heart is really the right thing to do before God. That’s I guess the best I know how to answer your particular question. I can’t really go into the details about how people are going to take that. Everyone’s going to have their own impression about whether that’s good, bad or indifferent, but I don’t know what will happen until you actually have the case. I haven’t had any particular recent case of CSA, I don’t know of anything that’s real current along that line.

Re: What if our local church chooses to follow the North Carolina Policy?

Craig Winquist I haven’t really thought a lot about that. I think in general, the churches are going to be having to make some of these decisions on their own about what they’re what they’re comfortable with.

Re: Concern that workers aren’t following I Corinthians 5. Being spirit led, yet countless overseers across the country are reacting differently.

Well at least I’ve told you a little bit about how I feel and my concerns. I realize that leaves a lot of question marks and I’m not surprised. We will keep in touch with people. I’ll be talking with our staff and obviously we’ve got some things that we need to discuss and talk about. We hope we can put something out that you’ll be able to understand a little bit better maybe what where we’re coming from, but it’s not something I can do just impromptu really like this. I do feel it’s just fair that at least I let you know kind of where I’m coming from and I’ve been listening to everyone else for a long time. I think I know where everyone else is coming from and so we do love you, we care for you, we care for our children, and we want to do what is right and good for them and for us and for the future and of course we obviously want God involved as well and I think everyone does as well. This isn’t the end of our conversation but we’ll just keep in touch.

Re: How can trust be restore when it has been violated / destroyed? It won’t come back unless we see something visible. We can’t keep doing the same things we have done for 75 years.

Jennifer Horton I just wanted to say that in the field where I was earlier this year the last field where I was in we had a situation of CSA and it was handled and the person is not in meetings anymore and the people who went to that meeting are feeling trust, trustworthy about those decisions and things are calm in Oklahoma. I think that he was the only perpetrator that we have in Oklahoma actually but I’m just saying that this is a case that was handled and it’s been since the Dean Brewer case and people are aware of what’s happened and it was taken care of. That was without a policy.

Re: How would convention ground owners in another state know that the person should not attend?

Jennifer Horton Well he’s been instructed and he understands that he’s not to be at any convention not to be at any gospel meeting and not to be at any special meeting he’s very well aware of his parameters.

Re: That person visited out-of state as his situation wasn’t communicated/known. Would this have been known at all, but for the disclosures since Dean Bruer?

Jennifer Horton It’s correct that we have known about it and we did what we could and it’s been in the court system and the courts have been handling it since it happened. It was not the Dean Bruer that brought it to light, it was we were aware of it and it’s been in the court system.

Re: How can we trust predators to follow recommendations from the workers when we know they don’t care about safety standards?

Jennifer Horton I felt like it’s worked well in Oklahoma. He doesn’t come to Convention anymore and he doesn’t come to Sunday morning meeting anymore and he doesn’t come to special meeting or gospel meeting anymore.

Re: Is there blind faith that he will do the right thing or does everyone know about him?

Jennifer Horton He’s well known in Oklahoma. He would he would understand that everybody knows who he is.

Re: He knows that people in other states don’t know about him, so what is there to stop him turning up there?

Jennifer Horton Yeah might be a situation of where there should be more communication but if the law doesn’t lock him up then we can’t really control him as far as where he goes and what he does so it would come down to a communication really more than a policy.

Re: Why can’t we have a simple protocol to protect people?

Jennifer Horton All those things were done like everything that was in the protocol or in the policy or whatever were done, and people did their reporting and it was reported to the workers it was reported to the elders they were all involved. Everyone knew about it, then a letter was sent out to the whole state saying this person is no longer going to be, this has been a problem and he’s no longer going to be at convention, special meeting, whatever, so it follows even the policy of those who need to know and then that would maybe be a question as to how many need to know. So maybe that’s where a little bit of the problem comes in, is in knowing how many people need to know, but as far as how the thing was handled, it just it was handled according basically to the policy guidelines that we’ve been studying but we didn’t have a policy about it we just understood that that was the right thing to do and so that’s what we did.


In March 2024, some of the team had a meeting to discuss the creation, operation and ending of the Taskforce on that call with Craig and workers. The video starts at 1:38:40
https://youtu.be/hHkiXL0EjSw?si=gl3yMAFl2_B89z7A&t=5920

They recalled early optimism that Craig supported the creation of a policy, and his comments: “…he said I think everyone will have a policy, it’ll either be one that the workers and people have worked out together or if that doesn’t happen people will form their own policy. He said he was convinced that everyone would have a policy”.

One day he said he had read all of the proposed policies that he knew about and he thought he liked the North Carolina policy the best, and Texas seemed to have more pages about how to get predators back in the meeting than it does on helping victims and he didn’t like that.

Members noted that at a meeting that happened in December, where Craig was going to provide his thoughts, there was only one thing that happened between Thanksgiving and that and that was the Tennessee special meetings that Craig attended and there were several overseers there. Whatever happened in Tennessee stopped the progress. Within a week our policy, Minnesota-Iowa was stopped and Southwest was stopped and you might say it was very coordinated on how the policy stopped. What did stay intact was Texas and North Carolina.

It was noted that overseers have access to the list of ~750 alleged perpetrators, but that information has not been provided to elders or to sister workers. There are apparently 10-12 names in the Tri-state area, yet Jennifer Horton claimed that there were only 2 cases in the area: one supposedly unfounded, and the other being dealt with by another state. That lack of disclosure, and lack of removal of those people from meetings, does not show proper honesty.


WINGS commends the task force for their work and keen moral clarity.